At Livermore Metropolis Council’s June 14 meeting, people and town officials dealt with an ongoing debate about no matter if harmful squander is present at the web site where Eden Housing’s 130-unit economical housing development will be created.
Conserve Livermore Downtown, a group organization that opposes the venture, printed an ad in The Independent newspaper that claimed the Town Council “Dismissed newfound fears with regards to poisonous squander at Eden Housing internet site” when they unanimously accepted the proposed plan final thirty day period.
“It has long been known that the web-site where Eden Housing seeks to establish housing has been contaminated with direct, arsenic, petroleum, hydrocarbons, perchloroethylene and other poisonous poisons. Nevertheless a new letter from the regional board overseeing web site cleanup was disregarded by the Town Council in their hurry to approve the flawed Eden Housing Program,” the advertisement reads, which also features the symbol for radioactive contamination.
The letter the team referenced in the advert was a typical correspondence sent to the metropolis by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water High-quality Manage Board in February, metropolis officials reported.
Previous Livermore Mayor John Marchand was the initially to remark on this situation through the citizens forum part of the council meeting. Marchand mentioned that there is no radioactive contamination at the website and that the reason of the Preserve Livermore Downtown ad was to “create fear and distrust in our group” as component of a “diligently crafted misinformation marketing campaign.”
He also resolved the group’s option plan, which phone calls for the housing progress to be moved to an vacant parcel across Railroad Avenue and a neighborhood park to be developed at the recent undertaking site.
“If the customers of this team of a lot of names definitely think that this web site was as contaminated as they declare, then they need to in its place assistance the internet site remaining a parking great deal and a parking garage and never ever becoming a park where children would play,” Marchand claimed.
Two speakers next Marchand echoed very similar sentiments about the veracity of the ad’s promises.
Donna Cabanne of the Tri-Valley branch of the Sierra Club doubled down on the assertion that the site is contaminated. “There is significant contamination beneath the Eden Housing downtown property,” she said, including that the Sierra Club passed a resolution in support of any action to delay the project until eventually the water board concludes an investigation and shares with the general public the extent and degree of contamination and the cleanup remediation program. In its resolution, the group also requests that the metropolis and Eden Housing give the public 30 times to evaluation and remark on the impacts of the contamination.
Although the discussion was not an agendized item, Mayor Bob Woerner and Vice Mayor Trish Munro acknowledged the debate towards the end of the assembly throughout matters initiated.
“This report demands to be established straight,” Woerner claimed right before inquiring metropolis workers to clarify the factors resolved in the drinking water board’s letter.
City engineer Bob Vinn reported the all round function of the letter “was for the water board to connect their concurrence with the metropolis report’s conclusions and request further analysis to assess any impacts from the property’s former use as a lumber lawn and also to notify the town that a website administration system would have to be reviewed and authorized by the water board prior to development and redevelopment of the internet site.”
Vinn also mentioned the water board created two requests, such as a info hole assessment function program and an interim remedial motion plan. He added that the information and facts from these studies would present the board with an comprehension of the extent of site contamination and detect remedial selections to minimize or do away with future impacts. Vinn said that the letter is regular as aspect of the system of remediating attainable contamination at a enhancement site.
When Woerner asked, “Is there any basis for believing that there is radioactive material on the web-site?” Vinn answered, “No.”
At the finish of the discussion, Munro extra that ahead of the council permitted the undertaking, the dilemma about contamination was questioned at its May well 24 assembly and town employees “entirely debunked the plan.”
“This problems are unable to be disregarded because it damages the entire group,” Munro claimed of the Conserve Livermore Downtown advert, which she referred to as “propaganda.” She continued, “It is really nonsense to squander everyone’s time. It wastes our energy and it wastes money and it is really a non-situation. It distracts us from performing on the serious troubles and alternatives that we could be doing work on.”
A entire recording of the June 14 council meeting is out there below and a checklist of all water board communications and web page reviews connected to the Eden Housing task can be discovered on the city’s site.